>I have so many questions...but my biggest question is about
>the original 2002 charges
>
>He was charged with 21 counts
>
>My understanding, is those are based on tapes
>
>as in, 21 different tapes
>
>I understand the issues with the girl in the pee tape...her
>and her family not co-operating, etc...
>
>But what happened in the other 20 cases?
>
>Did all of these girls and their families decide not to
>co-operate as well?

basically there was no way to tell when the tape was made so unless the girls came forward and said that was me and I was X years-old then there's basically no case.


>IRT the Florida case being dropped...I don't even understand
>that at all
>
>They found photos...but weren't allowed to find them...?
>
>So many questions...

If evidence is found in an illegal search (i.e. no warrant etc.) a good lawyer will get that thrown out.