The limited data available that we do have actually signals the opposite: that Sanders is a strong general election candidate vs. Trump.

Even Chris Hayes saw it fit to make this point on MSNBC.

Also - if that's your stance - you think Pete/Bloomberg/Amy/Warren/Biden are somehow stronger in a gen. election matchup? None of whom have amassed a grass-roots movement and diverse coalition capable of high turnout?

It's fair to point out the flaws in Sanders (and he certainly has his flaws) and to make the case that you disagree w/ his policies (that's what a primary is for) - but to ignore the data and what's actually happening on the ground - and then hide behind "he's not electable" instead of saying what you really mean is intellectually dishonest.


-->