>Like, we're supposed to be happy to have Dem representation
>in these states. But if they're not going to oppose Kavanaugh
>then what, precisely, are they worth to Democrats? If the
>threat to Roe isn't sufficient, then what is the big moment(s)
>when having the "D" next to their names means something more
>than, in the wise words of @cocksailor "conservatives who want
>a thank you card"?
>
>*this is obviously in anticipation of him getting a Senate
>vote. I appreciate the pain in the ass that the Judiciary
>Committee Dems are throwing into this, but it's not going to
>work in any immediate way.

They are the white equivalent of the dude at your job there to fill out a role in the diversity picture for prospective employees and investors.

Kavanaughty out here sexually assaulting women? The fuck? Dems gotta obstruct this for Merrick Garland's revenge.