13275496, Yea on second thought you're probably right. Posted by Brew, Thu Jul-19-18 08:58 PM
>the debate that got her was the first when her strategy was >to let him make a fool of himself, not realizing that millions >of voters didn't see him as an incompetent jackass. she >definitely should have been much more aggressive on that one. >and imagine lester holt wishes he had a time machine.
I forgot about the disaster that was the first debate. I say "disaster" in hindsight cause at the time I thought it wasn't necessarily a terrible strategy but looking back she should've been all over him from the get go. Because he had already said and done a bunch of shit that should've knocked him out in all of the Repub debates and it didn't hurt him, so what made her/us think that it would happen once it got down to the final two ? Ugh.
>she was also phased from the deplorables backlash at that >point, so she didn't go in until later. she did better with >the last debate.
Ughhhhh that was crazy. Cause she was right (again) but she should've known better. And now I can't even use that word to describe how deplorable Trump people are because they'll just throw it back in my face like the idiots they are.
>then comey opening up the emails like a week later really >fucked up any punch she had in the third debate with regards >to being compromised.
*cough* Russia *cough*
|