13274534, But he pulls together a narrative without fully engaging his sources.
Posted by MEAT, Mon Jul-16-18 11:56 AM
For example here’s Sarah herself in her own words about the 1988 article on Trump.
Yes, it's cited in my article. When Chait wrote there was not much reported about Trump's 1987 trip, he was incorrect. There is quite a bit, some of it in Russian sources. Those additional sources are cited in my piece.
https://twitter.com/sarahkendzior/status/1018327805094973441?s=21
Put another way. John Chait weaved a strong narrative and conclusion based on available public information in the US. It’s a strong hypothesis.
Meanwhile over the past few years a number of journalists independent and non have rifles through older news articles, engaged Russian sources and media, and provided a more full timeline that you can draw your own conclusions from.
|