|Go back to previous topic|
|Forum name||General Discussion|
|Topic subject||I’m not understanding what you’re getting at. |
13265708, I’m not understanding what you’re getting at. |
Posted by MEAT, Tue Jun-12-18 01:06 PM
It’s my belief that Barack Obama 18-24 year senator would have been better for the American experiment of Democracy than Barack Obama 7.25 years of presidency overall.
In as such being a president is limited and being a former president is also limiting.
And that one of the more gifted politicians in recent history will be basically “the Beatles” instead of The Roots in terms of longevity and actual measure of talent vs noteriety and legacy