>But for real, the less political experience the better. The
>longer you've been in government, the more the opponent can
>point to what you did or didn't do. That's always bad.
>
>As long as you can fall back on what you would have done, you
>will always have a winning position.
>With that said, the DNC will probably push someone like Chuck
>Schumer

Apparently there's little correlation between experience and skill in being president.

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/our-worst-presidents-came-in-with-a-lot-of-experience/

As bad of a candidate as Hillary was, there's no really knock in her resume, to me at least. But like the article mentions, very little of being president connects to political credibility.