13089036, Yep Posted by Lurkmode, Tue Nov-01-16 11:12 AM
> >I mean, I definitely wouldn't lump them with Trump heads but >hardcore Hil supporters are not worth talking to. > >It took a matter of minutes for you to be called naive just >because of this post. > > >As they talk down to you about politics and how the world >works, they tend to forget it themselves. > > >Hilary is/and has been extremely disliked. It doesn't matter >why, it doesn't matter if you agree...people don't like her. >Blame Fox News, blame whoever...it doesn't matter WHY. People >don't like her or trust her. > >Yes, Bernie or another candidate would have faced an onslaught >of negativity. > >BUT > >Hilary already started at being unlikable. Everything that >comes out, false alarm or not, just piles on. > >A Bernie (and I have to put this in for Hil supporters- I'm >not Bernie head) or another candidate wouldn't have STARTED >with a high unfavorable rating. > > >Anyone who says she is VERY lucky she isn't facing a sane >Repub candidate is 1000% right. > >On the flip side, the Dems should be coasting to this thing >and winning the Senate. > >But they anointed the wrong candidate because it was her turn. > > >And again, she is the WRONG CANDIDATE because weather you like >it or not, she is not liked or trusted. > >Simple and plain. > >The Dems should have actually thought about their purpose- >winning elections. > >But Democrats gonna Democrat. > > >
Hillary stans not trying to hear any of that.
|