and before you say HRC is offering the same policies on green energy

she also has a record.

of course we wouldn't expect her to be more diplomatic and less military in her foreign policy

so at the base of it

I agree with some core tenants of Jill's campaign

and I believe her.

btw, you're still doing it

"but given that the (realistic) choice on the table is these two candidates it makes little sense, especially considering the stakes which is why blow's article is focused on trying to convince people to actually make a meaningful choice
nothing wrong with that."

so people that don't agree with you and blow or whomever, are stupid because they didn't vote for HRC

but voted for a candidate because of the same reasoning you offered

they agree with their policies

do you see it?

if she doesn't get elected, blame her.