but given that the (realistic) choice on the table is these two candidates
it makes little sense, especially considering the stakes
which is why blow's article is focused on trying to convince people to actually make a meaningful choice
nothing wrong with that.

you can still go ahead and vote for whomever you want, regardless
for me - i remain curious as to what is so great about the jill/johnson platforms (for their supporters, i.e.)
that makes this an calculation they are willing to make (given that the stakes are high)

i'm still waiting to hear these policies.
as i said, i've read stein/ ive read johnson. i dont see the appeal.

>this attempt to scapegoat people who don't vote for HRC

scapegoat?
maybe you are just being defensive, here.
we'll see what happens in nov. but if either candidate loses by a small margin, even a 5% showing by the 3rd party candidates will be looked at. its how things work.


>for the same reasons you listed that you are voting for HRC
you are yet to list reasons for voting for your 3rd party candidate (other than a protest vote)
what are the issues that attract you?