He brings up a lot of good points, namely that there really isn't a rational comparison between the two.

The candidate who will not be named is a bigot and intolerable and unintelligent outside of his ability to manipulate people and the press.

Hillary isn't perfect. She's played with fire by not being transparent about the emails, even if it's a non-issue, and for whatever reason can't tap into the potential impact her election would mean for the country and women.

But if you list her credentials and policy stances and experience working as a politician, which is a credit while dealing with politicians, I don't see that there wouldn't be a better candidate than her.

Sometimes it seems her biggest fault is that she isn't Obama and because of that can't captivate people's hope like he did. That isn't a fault of hers. Obama is just that special.