13036453, not really. we should go back to the 1939 supreme court ruling
Posted by akon, Tue Jun-21-16 03:32 PM
which i think is closer to what the 2nd amendment intended
the people, yes but only the people who are part of a well-regulated militia
the recent ruling is based on arguing what the comma means
i.e. it disengages the first part of that sentence (being part of a well regulated militia)
from the latter part (the people's right)
thats a failure of english
|