A lot more people would be alive.

If you balance that negative with the positive of such personal use of such weapons (what is it again?), then you have to conclude it's an easy decision to either ban their use or greatly restrict who can own such a weapon.

I don't think you absolutely have to ban them, we just have to stop allowing any tom, dick or hank from being able to so easily purchase them.




>And when I say Culture, I'm talking about the promotion of
>Gun Violence in all forms of entertainment - especially in
>movies and video games? What will banning any weapon do if the
>country is obsessed with using and promoting guns (all types)
>as the primary source / solution for winning or stopping a
>threat? If the gun is considered the only equalizer then what
>will change?
>
>Also, more people die from handguns than assault weapons. It's
>just the magnitude of one single event (mass shooting by one
>person) that captures the real horror the gun crazed culture.
>
>If the government bans Assault Weapons and does not ban the
>use of these weapons in entertainment then, in my opinion, the
>ban is a fake solution that's being promoted a means to
>appease the masses reaction to horrible events.
>
>
>I say all forms of guns in movies except for historical
>material like war movies or movies based on true events in
>conjunction with banning assault weapons.
>
>Just my opinion. How do you feel?
>
>.
>.
>.


**********
"Everyone has a plan until you punch them in the face. Then they don't have a plan anymore." (c) Mike Tyson

"what's a leader if he isn't reluctant"