>I got the privilege to see you IRL the other day with the
>news clip about Prince. I was happy to see what you looked
>like. Maybe that sounds weird? Thanks for alot more
>too....cause i really appreciate having dialogue with you.
>I've read many of your columns and look up to you in that
>regard.\
>
>Yes...Van Jones and other pundits NEED this Trump v Clinton to
>be a thing so they can have jobs too. I get that. But the
>new world of social media opens Trump's lane in my
>angst-ridden worries.

Thanks for the kind words, dog...Really means a lot...

As for Van, dude is a straight shooter...He doesn't bullshit...So I don't think it has anything to do with him needing Trump to stay a viable candidate in order to keep a job...

That's just Van's make-up...Dude has always been on some ANYTHING THAT CAN GO WRONG WILL PROBABLY GO WRONG...

I get it...And like I said, Clinton should not approach Trump like he's cooked food...Dude is a loose cannon....THAT aspect of Trump should not be underestimated...But the demographics r the demographics...It's def. going to be interesting...