>Last night showed me two things:
>
>1.) Hillary and Bernie are only separated by degrees and vocal
>enthusiasm on 90% of the issues that they could impact as
>president and
>
>2.) Bernie's lack of details really undercuts his ability to
>make statements about sweeping change. When it's all said and
>done, folks wanna do what Bernie wants to do, but he can't
>tell them how they're gonna get there.
>
>It's like what happened in Chicago when Rahm ran against Chuy.
> Folks liked what Chuy had to say, but he ain't have no plan
>to back it up and it cost him because voters kinda like
>elected officials who lay out things like plans. Bernie is
>having that same problem. For young voters, that debate
>looked like a win for him because they saw him speak truth to
>power and say what he feels. For older voters, he totally
>lost because they saw him yammering on about breaking up banks
>when they don't need to hear that, they need to know how he
>plans to get it done.


This^^^^^

Again, can't get stressed enough. If the fuel that drives your engine is Clinton is too close to Wall Street, then u have to have specifics on how she has shone to be under their spell...When pressed, Bernie was unable to do so...

Politics is a dirty business...But it's also quite simple......It helps to have a weak, muddling candidate in order to paint that person the way u want....The problem is Clinton, who is a lot of things, ain't weak...When u go against someone like her u have to have your shit together...U gotta have concrete facts, and not just innuendo....

I think Bernie does most of his damage on Clinton when it comes to her Middle East policies....He needs to turn the heat up on THAT if he wants to truly do some damage to Clinton....