I mean, for example let's say you're Toyota. And you sell a car to Joe Smith.

Joe Smith gets shit hammered drunk one night and runs a red light a strikes and kills a pedestrian.

Should Toyota be protected from liability for damages inflicted at someone else's volition?

Hmm, actually when you put it like that it still doesn't make sense. You'll have to ask a Hillary supported to explain that one. Sounds like common sense to me.