http://www.cbsnews.com/news/john-kasich-id-consider-nominating-merrick-garland-supreme-court-election-2016/

Again...I'm not saying there's not idealogical differences. I'm contending that those idealogical differences may not result in any pragmatic consequences.

Full disclosure....I'm using this hypothetical to show that the principle of supporting Hillary over Bernie on a purely pragmatic basis (which Strav is pretty clearly not doing but what many others are) is a slippery slope.

I can't be the only one who it's occurred to......a purely pragmatic liberal who supports Bernie's idealogy but is scared to support him on a pragmatic basis might be more inclined to want Hillary against Trump/Cruz....but then because of diminishing consequences....want Bernie against Kasich.