>Who gives a fuck about "now"

anyone who doesn't light up at the sight of a "breaking news ticker"

& last time i checked time is of the essence when it comes to criminal justice proceedings. they have a whole show about it called 48 hours.

>The only simulation that matters in relation to bill Cosby
>himself and what he is alleged to have done is whether or not
>he did What is being alleged. That's it.

yeah & i have EVERY reason to trust that the american justice system will get to the bottom of this million-dollar question. smh.

>I assume there's a lot of dirt under the fingernails of many.

so you agree, then. game, blouses.

>Creating the straw man of "studio execs who cover things up
>for years" is the real "distraction" here because even if it's
>true, it doesn't absolve Bill and that's the issue.

there's a huge difference between a straw man and a group of accomplices with similar interests...

>Until/unless there's evidence suggesting an a actual cover up-
>not an implied cover up created under "think about it" logic-
>then yeah, that's a worthwil thread to pull and that's only
>because that person should be held responsible too. Not
>because it will exonerate Bill Cosby and let's be clear,
>that's the only reason you're bringing this up, as a hail Mary
>to suggest bill should be allowed to waltz.

if you really have to think about whether or not this info was known & covered up then, you're either white or just lying.

& i love how you ommitted my saying that cosby is guilty of at least some of the allegations. good job.