>>cause that Sony catalog was worth hundreds of millions if
>not
>>billions.
>>
>>They are trying to ruin that Black mans legacy and now the
>>most influential Black family on TV is no where to be found.
>
>
>Who is They?

"They" are the people who wanted MJ's catalog and the people who profited off of Cosby. In this conspiracy its the people who didnt want him to purchase NBC.

>>But Charlie Sheen was fucking women when he had HIV and is
>>still on TV.
>
>Yeah this one is weird. Dude should be in jail. He swears he
>had women sign release forms or whatever so maybe he actually
>has those somewhere.
>
>>Time Magazine called Dave chappelle a crackhead after he
>>walked away from CC. Dave spoke on that shit in his live
>show
>>after he returned.
>
>>Katt Williams started talking about some
>>real shit in his comedy act and all a sudden he is
>"reported"
>>to be crazy.
>
>Real shit? Such as? All I heard was a few illuminati/they're
>out to get me situations. I don't listen to dude like that
>though, but I do notice that a lot of his fans tend to be on
>this exact same "They/Them/The Man Behind The Curtain- WHOEVER
>HE IS- will get us all! I HAVE NO EVIDENCE BUT THINK ABOUT
>IT!!!

White people and the powerful people in the entertainment industry.


>>Now, maybe all these Black entertainers are crazt but I
>doubt
>>it. Once you stop doing what they want they throw yiu out to
>>the wolves.
>
>No. All black entertainers are perfectly sane, rational, good,
>upstanding citizens and none of them EVER, EVER, EVER do
>anything REMOTELY wrong and if they do it's only because
>Officer/Agent/President Whitey planted the rape/coke/etc on
>them.

Yeah... no one said that.

>There are real issues when we get into tangible issues of
>institutional racism- conviction rates, prison sentencing,
>wage equality, fair housing practices, the list goes on. When
>we get down to this level of over generalizations with dubious
>circumstantial evidence, there's no conversation to be had.
>It's just religion at that point, some shit you take on faith.
>
>
>>20 or so white women raped by a Black man in the 60's and
>>70's... FOH.
>
>Why not? That's not an objective view of the allegations. It's
>just more "THINK ABOUT IT!" and that shit doesn't hold up in
>court OR public opinion for most of us.

What doesnt hold up is 20 to 30 white women not having enough power or courage to come forward during the 60's and 70's.