>i wasn't the one that brought it up and i overall think it's
>of the shrugworthy yet valid arguments to take issue with...

i have no idea what you're talking about.

>the person who expressed that expressed it clearly and still
>had to have several back and forths for folks to realize he
>wasn't saying what they thought he said

what?

>i'm saying, that's not a huge deal to me but i could see how
>the name could be an issue to those that support and oppose
>the walks

good for you.