The point is for Christians this should be the biggest injustice in HUMAN history!

Y'all should have been fighting for this but you didn't, so why fight on topics related to politics now?

Again why would Jesus rather have people in the "struggle" when he clearly said in Luke18:36 ( that's in the Bible too) that his kingdom was no part of this world & if it were then his attendants would have fought for him so he wouldn't be delivered to the Jews?

Im not goin "tit for tat" with the scriptures however, I am gonna continue to cite them it cuz we are discussing a topic on the church & the church should be based on Gods word, should it not?

Again I don't belong to ANY church

I respect your viewpoint on that too cuz iont think believe they should be paid but, that's a different subject for a different time.




>it's a story.
>you are supposed to read it to get the gist of the meaning.
>
>(jesus said that, too... btw.
>follow the spirit of the law, not the letter of it.)
>
>digging into why jesus' disciples didn't ride for him
>is missing the point, in this context.
>
>
>what matters is that jesus would
>rather the church be made of ppl
>like MLK and malcolm x and the ppl that marched in the 60s and
>the ppl marching right now...
>
>as opposed to ppl staying OUT of this struggle because the
>church shouldn't be "political."
>
>
>
>that was my only point.
>and there is no need to go tit for tat in scriptures.
>
>if you think you know the bible better than me you do.
>
>if you don't want churches to be in the struggle join one that
>isn't.
>
>
>but Black Liberationist theology
>is a valid interpretation of the scripture, and tbh it makes
>more sense than an interpretation that justifies
>pastors getting jets and spending all sundat preaching hell
>fire and brimstone.
>
>
>
>it doesn't matter if you disagree.
>
>we will be fine either way.
>