>What are you basing this statement on? Is it too much force
>because she is a woman, or just too much force in general?
>If we replace the woman with another football player, is it
>still to much force?
>
>To me, it looks to me like he responded with equal force. He
>was just better at punching than she is.
>Just like if it was a shootout. The fact that you hit your
>target and the other guy missed doesn't mean that you used
>more force.
>
>The whole logic of having to assess the potential strength and
>fighting ability of your attacker before striking back is
>dumb.
>
>The appropriateness of a course of action should be the same
>no matter what the gender, size, strength, etc. of the
>aggressor.
>


Maybe technically according to the law but it was still a punk move

He's an elite athlete , sort of equivalent to the fact that boxers attacking regular people have greater consequence

I've dealt with aggressive women before never had to hit one