12793901, really not even about what's right or wrong. Posted by Vex_id, Wed Apr-29-15 01:44 PM
This is basic constitutional interpretation 101.
A perfect example of how judges as objective creatures is a myth. Most of these justices can't get out of their own ideological/fundamentalist way and do their duty to emphatically state the law and apply it to a basic situation, sans personal opinion.
This is akin to debating whether we should issue a driver's license to a person with brown hair.
-->
|