>Well in previous days and ages, where women were considered
>property, their "virginity" was basically esteemed as their
>only desirable worth. It was determined that in order for a
>woman to get a man, she couldn't be with anyone else, and
>ultimately was beholden to the man's desires.
>
>In this day and age, where women are not property but
>individuals, then their "virginity" should not only not be
>required, but their "virginity" should not even be a thing. It
>really doesn't exist.
>
>However, if a person decides on their own regard that they
>want to abstain, for any reason, secular or sacred, then to
>each their own. And at some point they will venture out, or
>meet someone, and take that step, pre or post marriage. But
>they won't have to feel beholden to someone else's desires, or
>plan, or expectations. People can just be, as God intended.
>

You ended that with "as God intended" but He intended us to wait.


.
.
.
"And the Lord’s servant must not be quarrelsome but must be kind to everyone, able to teach, not resentful." ~ 2 Tim 2:4