>
>>Last time my bot was crying over a loss of life.
>
>So that's it? It's cool if that's the case but it supports the
>author's point.
>

I don't think so. You seem to think that men are losing something just because we don't like to cuddle up with each other and talk about out day.

Boy Bye.


>>Men only want their barber to touch their hair.
>
>That also supports the author's point.
>

But that doesn't rove the article.



>>Men not cuddling had nothing to do with the whole gist if
>the
>>article.
>
>Yeah that was the point - that's the kind of platonic touch
>the author says men are missing.
>


I diesagree.


>>The article is wack.
>
>I'm not surprised you think so.
>
>


I'm not the only one that thinks the article is WACK.

.
.
.
"And the Lord’s servant must not be quarrelsome but must be kind to everyone, able to teach, not resentful." ~ 2 Tim 2:4