>yes, it is an obvious bob marley jack.
>but stevie should not have had to clear that.
>
>i am glad stevie wonder could make and release that song
>without worying about getting sued.
>
>but if this ruling is correct (and it's not) stevie
>could be sued for master blaster.
>
>why do you think that makes sense?

yes, because like you said, it's a clear Marley jack. First time I heard Master Blaster it was obvious...

I doubt Marley cared tho because reggae was all about jacking songs...

but if his estate sued, they would prolly win.
>
>
>and he'd have to pay an infinite number of ppl for
>"don't you worry about a thing."
>
>why is that a good thing in your world?

because they were blatant rip offs

same with Part Time Lover. Hall & Oates can or should have been broke off for it.

I still love all those songs, but if sued, he has to pay.