>it says, these are the things i believe, and i feel strongly
>about them. it appeals only to those who share her (my mistake
>in previous responses, my patriarchy was showing) beliefs. she
>describes not a single real life example that supports her
>paranoia
>
>but what i find most disingenuous or wrong about the whole
>thing, other than the small minded bigotry, is the idea that
>Christianity features a singular or true theology through
>which it's rightly understood. it's such a wrong concept (and
>by the way one thats totally rejected by theologans and
>scholars world wide) i find it especially lame


As I have said before, many can't understand or comprehend the scriptures because they are foolishness to a fallen world.

But what the author is suggesting in regards to the church is not rejected by theologians and scholars word wide. Seriously, just saying stuff and making things up doesn't make it true.


.
.
.
"Today is your day to have a better life -- it's your right."