in responding?

And when I did come back to respond I saw that SoWhat did a good job summing it up so I saved key strokes by just pigging backing what he said.

I am not sure why you trying to read some sinister motives in all of that.

You should better to ignore rah rah and stay focused.

>It contributed to the nonsense that ensued. Originally you
>never responded and you know it. You Let SoWhat claim your
>response. And other's chose to push the Rah Rah Button and go
>in on some BS.
>
>
>
>>I thought of something else I wanted to add (the cast the
>>first stone story) so I edited my response to add that story.
>
>>
>>
>>I am not sure why you think that edit is important.
>>
>>I posted the verse that immediately came to mind when
>reading
>>that piece. You asked my why I posted it, SoWhat did a
>pretty
>>good articulation why I posted it.
>>
>>I answered your question. At least try to answer my
>>question.
>>
>>It's a sincere question. Not a gotcha or an attempt to
>troll.
>>I'd like to know your answer.
>>
>>It'd be disappointing if you evade, distract (concern about
>>editing) or flat out refuse to engage in discussion of faith
>>with challenging questions.
>>
>>
>But I will respond since you asked.


**********
"Everyone has a plan until you punch them in the face. Then they don't have a plan anymore." (c) Mike Tyson

"One of the most important things in life is what Judge Learned Hand described as 'that ever-gnawing inner doubt as to whether you're r