but you're gonna have to IF you plan on hearing what I'm saying as an individual.

>your 'clarity' and your definition of sex. both have been
>soundly rejected by critical thinkers who woke up and saw the
>various ways these definitions have been used by those in
>power against those w/o power.
>


That's all well and good, yet THIS critical thinker still has the same view.
Also, books like the bible have been used both for good and ill. You have to talk to
believers as individuals to ascertain their ideas and intentions toward you, rather than
assuming that they're against you because they're christian, muslim, etc.
It's the same with my views. You've heard certain words I'm saying before.
Am I against you though? You don't even care. You just assume that I am before you
know my intentions, so that you preach your rhetoric.
I have no desire to marginalize you or anyone else.
Playing victim seems to be fun for you though... I get it.