>Then they ramped it up in the early 2000s then tried to play
>it off by saying its for "energy"

you're using rhetoric, but we need facts. Not only has the independent Atomic Agency
determined that Iran's present nuclear capacity is nowhere near enrichment levels (90% uranium enrichment) such that it could weaponize the energy, but Israel's own intelligence agency (Mossad) has declared so as well. So there is no evidence to suggest that in 2015, Iran is trying to weaponize and enrich to 90%.

One of the problems that plagues international relations is the inability to accept that regimes can change, as can cultures. The Iranian people aren't suicidal, and while Iran will defend itself (as will every other nation on earth) - we mustn't rush to assume that they are "imminently positioned" to "attack!" "bomb!" and "destroy!" - particularly when the evidence declares otherwise. Or have we learned nothing of the rush to war in the wake of the egregious lies about Iraq WMD's?

Liars must be held accountable.



-->