>
>^^^that is not a theory, not even in the slightest. If you
>cant/wont concede to that then there really is no argument
>from your perspective, but only wishful thinking
>
>
>i like what you're trying to wrestle with but that part is not
>advancing your argument

Scientific laws and facts change. There are only a few things I can say for certain. As far as I am concerned, the jury is still out on everything fundamental. Our understanding is infinitesimally small, and it is full of holes and presuppositions that stand as the foundation for our best attempts. As long as our technology keeps improving so will our understanding of physical laws that we think are rigid.