>Placeholder. Only for the most profound reality there ever
>was. That's pretty hilarious. Gee, it reminds me of something
>called God.

Actually not at all. The difference being the concept of god to believers is infallible. It can't not be. Big Bang can be removed from the equation if more information is provided which proves it unnecessary.

>For my further amusement:
>
>"The Big Bang singularity is the most serious problem of
>general relativity because the laws of physics appear to break
>down there," Ahmed Farag Ali at Benha University and the
>Zewail City of Science and Technology, both in Egypt, told
>Phys.org.

Technically they don't actually break down there though. It goes through bang and crunch cycles creating the multiverse, only one of which we are in. So that quote is actually a misrepresentation.

>The laws break down, do you know what that implies? It implies
>that the laws prove nothing because they are not present to
>verify their own existence. There is NOTHING to substantiate
>the singularity.

Wrong there's actually a lot which supports it, not the least of which is the observable expansion of the universe. But go ahead and take that quote on faith.

> It is taken on faith just as god is. The
>singularity is god and god is the singularity, in that they
>share ZERO evidence where physical laws are impossible, and
>both drive the most profound question that we have to
>consider.

Again you're wrong, but seeing as you're just happy a couple of scientist are against the big bang...


█▆▇▅▇█▇▆▄▁▃
Big PEMFin H & z's
"I ain't no entertainer, and ain't trying to be one. I am 1 thing, a musician." � Miles

"When the music stops he falls back in the abyss."