to what I said.

RE: those shooters don't represent all muslims

I agree. Don't think I said otherwise.


>Most people aren't defending the shooters (who btw are dead).

Some people seem to be saying they "understand" the response.


>If this were just about them then it should be over all things
>considered right?

I don't know.

>
>You shooting up a kkk office and them then turning around and
>taking it out on ALL Black people would be an issue for most
>which is exactly what is happening here.

Yep. that's a reason why it's a bad idea.


>
>>If I went down to Mississippi and shot up the office of a
>>stormfront, Klan or Neo-Nazi publication that had a
>>circulation of 60,000 y'all would all agree that I was
>crazy.
>>
>>
>>Yet when these cats shoot up Charlie Hebdo which only has a
>>60k yall want to depict them as freedom fighters.
>>
>>Again, if this is about a oppressed minority fighting back
>>then I would say if they shot up government buildings or
>>whoever was more directly involved with oppressing them then
>>we would be having an entirely different conversation.
>>
>>But they shot up some cartoonists yo.
>>
>>
>>At this point I am less interest in hearing what the
>libtards
>>have to say on this and really want to hear from an honest
>to
>>god OKP Muslim speak on this and hear if they think the
>>gunman's reaction was a good ideal or even understandable.
>>
>>
>>
>>**********
>>"Everyone has a plan until you punch them in the face. Then
>>they don't have a plan anymore." (c) Mike Tyson
>>
>>http://blackpeopleonlocalnews.tumblr.com/
>


**********
"Everyone has a plan until you punch them in the face. Then they don't have a plan anymore." (c) Mike Tyson

http://blackpeopleonlocalnews.tumblr.com/