| Go back to previous topic | | Forum name | General Discussion | | Topic subject | RE: he later presented relevant case law, after it was buried | | Topic URL | http://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=4&topic_id=12676798&mesg_id=12677996 |
12677996, RE: he later presented relevant case law, after it was buried
Posted by bentagain, Wed Dec-17-14 10:21 AM
as it was explained to me
the old statute was initially presented, during the beginning of the grand jury sessions
and it wasn't until the very end of the sessions that the valid statute was introduced
and there was no explanation to the grand jury about the difference between the two, they were expected to figure that out
also, I'm asking, in this being the 1 case where the grand jury session is made public
and we see the DA using statutes he knows are invalid
as you alluded to, in order to reach a conclusion he wants
we have no idea how many times he's done that before
in general, in all cases, whether it's to indict or not
how many times has the DA manipulated the GJ like this?
| |