>>you compared work emails between two people to posting on
>>social media, and message boards. you do understand there's
>a
>>difference, right?
>>
>
>No I explained since the public can get info from people who
>work at the company and discuss what is going on by posting to
>message boards and social media, nobody should think they have
>privacy at work. Your talking like its one way and one reason
>for this stuff to come out.

Yeah, and I don't even know where to start in what a ridiculous stretch that is in response to emails between two parties being leaked, but ok...


>These companies do not exist in a vacuum, it's the general
>public working for them.

LOL c'mon.

>Less wrong ? I guess it's my turn to say huh and what. I
>never said anything about the hacker searching to expose
>employees. Are you having a conversation with somebody else ?

Seriously. do you not read the shit you type? I even quoted it, before i replied. Here, I'll quote what you said again:

"What kind of moral argument says oh the hackers are wrong
for spreading my racist work emails ?"

What does this mean? Really, what are you asking/implying?


>>LOL. i came in here in response to your "if someone does
>>something stupid at work, they should expect the public to
>see
>>it" comment. That's where i chimed in. I'm not sure why you
>>keep pointing to a post i never replied to like i'm avoiding
>>it.
>
>
>I was responding to that post so it's silly for you to address
>my comments without considering that. My argument was the
>difference that Buddy asked about.

I know where the thread started. Just because you replied underneath it with a general statement, doesn't mean it doesn't look like you're making a general statement. If you're being specific to that situation, it's a pretty simple to say "if the Sony VP was hacked before, hey should expect this to happen" instead of something as all-inclusive as "if someone does something stupid at work, they should expect the public to see it" or "you don't have privacy at work" over and over.


>>i'm gonna look at it. Same thing i did with the fappening.
>
>Ok so you agree and disagree at the same time.

No, i don't "agree" with it. I acknowledge it's wrong, and that i'm partaking in it while still acknowledging it's wrong. I'm perfectly fine with admitting to being part of the problem.