>#2- that email transcript belongs to the company. anything
>youd rather not have a higher up or HR read back to u, or your
>bad joke fwded along to others and wind up who knows where,
>shouldnt be in a company email



We all agree its the company email and their employer is entitled to see these email. Also this is not a case where a person forwarded and email to the wrong person so none of this explains why it's okay for the public to read.

>
>
>#3- anything youd rather not see subpoenaed and read back at a
>trial, shouldnt be in company email
>

Even your personal emails can be subpoenaed so I don't see why anything subpoenaeable is the standard.

>
>
>stolen sexts to your SO aint even the same league


You are basically just saying it's different because it's different.

That's not much of an explanation.



Also let's not forget why this stuff was leaked. Because a hostile foreign government wanted to intimidate or punish a studio for making a movie that they did not like. Seems like they were effective.

Also let's not forget they also released social security, payroll, medical information. Can we agree all that stuff isn't fair game?

If the rule is hacking private documents is wrong then it's wrong in this instance as well.




>
>
>
>>Folks generally agreed that partaking in pictures from the
>>fappening was morally wrong. How is this different though?
>>
>>
>>**********
>>"Everyone has a plan until you punch them in the face. Then
>>they don't have a plan anymore." (c) Mike Tyson
>>
>>http://blackpeopleonlocalnews.tumblr.com/
>


**********
"Everyone has a plan until you punch them in the face. Then they don't have a plan anymore." (c) Mike Tyson

http://blackpeopleonlocalnews.tumblr.com/