it's still a dumb question.
it's also a question they've been asked dozens of times.

the fact that ppl keep asking it is part of the problem.




>The constraints of the question is pick one word to describe
>why they are successful, not pick the one thing that will
>guarantee success.
>
>
>I don't think either will tell you being focused alone will
>make you successful.
>
>
>I don't think the question was intent to solving the complex
>question of what it takes to be successful.
>
>
>>it takes more than one thing to get to that level of
>success.
>>
>>bill gates was focused.
>>
>>but he had something to be focused on because
>>he was hooked up with a mainframe to fool around with
>>before most ppl knew what a computer was.
>>
>>bill gates didn't earn that first mainframe computer.
>>he just got it and became obsessed with it.
>>
>>the question suggest there is one thing that makes somebody
>>successful.
>>but unless we are talking about hitting lotto,
>>you need at least 2 or 3 things to break in your favor
>>for you to make it do what it do.
>>
>>i don't begrudge their answers,
>>but the question was phrased in a way that shows a
>>faulty or disingenuous assumption about how ppl become
>>successful.
>
>
>**********
>"Everyone has a plan until you punch them in the face. Then
>they don't have a plan anymore." (c) Mike Tyson
>
>http://blackpeopleonlocalnews.tumblr.com/