>You are a threat?
>
>Why does that same logic not apply to me?

it does.

you may defend yourself against the use of excessive force. your action may be found by a court to be justified.

I have represented a client charged with resisting arrest for kicking a cop. We claimed excessive force and self defense. We lost. We are appealing bc the judge refused to instruct the jury about self defense in response to excessive force.

>Why is the police officers life immd not just considered but
>flat out codified as more valuable to society...then mine?

that's not the case.

>In other words if an officer and I are in a confrontation...he
>may kill me because he is "in fear of his life" yet if I
>killed him with that exam same logic, I would be arrested for
>murder and prolly wouldn't make it back to the precinct for
>booking?

a police shooting is assumed justified if the cop is on duty. it is investigated. if found to be un-justified then a criminal charge will follow.

police have been prosecuted for shooting civilians w/o justification.

>What laws are these that codified this as how it is?

you have convinced yourself of an untruth.

>I want this shit off the books. For real. Whatever laws that
>give this cover?

again. you made this up.