>I don't think humans work so directly that there's any reason
>to assign only one motivation to an act.

Me either. Good job.

>"You can think that Aaron Bushnell is crazy *and* that he's
>right."
>
>to what end?

To literally the end you're describing above: trying to account for the possibility of more than one motivation.

>I can think the war is wrong and not think about that dude at
>all. I didn't need it to tell me, and I'm not sure who did

I mean, clearly somebody needs to be told that the war is wrong because it's still happening. But good work on your correct opinion.