>pretty much still ended up with one but i think it really was
>more well balanced then it looked at first sight.

Sixteen months out from the election, having Warren; some people who've had past moments of contenderhood like Booker and Klobuchar and O'Rourke; and some folks with potential to break into that (widely defined) upper tier like Gabbard and Castro isn't that bad.

>im hoping next debate is max 10 people split into two nights.

That would make a ton of sense, but I'm Gravel or bust in the debates and I don't think there's a reasonable top-10 that includes him.