>Now maybe the excerpts are just red meat to build hype for the
>book, and a large portion of it is self-reflection. If that is
>true, I take back my disdain for the book.
>But based on what has been released so far, it is simply 250
>pages of deflection,

I wish the book were of that type since it would be refreshing to see someone in a leadership role own their share of the responsibility of what went wrong to show some measure of wanting to learn from the past. Hell, she could help the Democratic party by showing looking inward at her flaws so her mistakes won't get replicated.

I hope that's the case instead of the snippets I've been reading in these online articles.