and avoiding the pathetic argument you made when you said

"Trump is pretending to be racist"

"there is no trace of any anti-hispanic sentiments in his past"

"he was a prominent, out-spoken, media-focused public figure for 30 years before he ran for president. Overnight....he switches from someone who barely EVER said anything about race to someone who ONLY talks about race."

" Compare the Trump public persona in 1995 to current day. They are two completely different people. He's a blank slate."

"And in 1973, he discriminated against people of color in his real estate business because of money. If he could profit by dealing with POC...he would've done so."

all of that.

>The level of conversation in these posts has taken a
>nosedive.

You really raised the conversation with the advocacy vs support straw man, and the quotes above.

>I'm only gonna say this one more time. Analyzing the way that
>Hitler used propaganda, persuasive powers and media to
>implement evil plans is NOT an advocacy of his agenda. In the
>same way....saying that Trump's use of media and
>persuasiveness and propaganda has been effective is not
>tantamount to advocating his agenda. That you can't
>differentiate between these things is, quite frankly,
>hilarious.
>

LOL more of the same, this transparent attempt to shift the focus of the conversation by you would look better if didnt spend all that time in previous threads talking about Trump using the Rob Ford plan, and handing the election to Trump every time something happens no matter what it is.