>Especially if we get into disallowing civil rights under
>because someone is living in sin as opposed to getting past
>something someone has done in the past and rehabilitated from.
>In that sense, it's far more Christian to take a stand against
>someone currently sinning than continue to condemn someone who
>has repented.

i dont understand how it falls under the 'something that needs forgiveness' blanket.
if christians want to argue that its a sin and that they are willing to forgive any that move past this sin
is not something i agree with
there;s no rehabilitation to be had

now if we are talking about rape and peodophilia?
thats just morally wrong to me
and there's an extent to which im willing to foresee that
in terms of being intimately involved with someone whom i feel
has done something that i deem reprehensible.