Go back to previous topic
Forum nameGeneral Discussion
Topic subjectRE: Any time you want to actually respond to what I said feel free
Topic URLhttp://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=4&topic_id=12716879&mesg_id=12717534
12717534, RE: Any time you want to actually respond to what I said feel free
Posted by c71, Tue Feb-03-15 03:47 PM

>>>So it's ok for you to talk about terrorism, but not me to
>>talk
>>>about some Christians being hypocrites. That is a white
>>>privilege equivalent.
>>>
>>>>
>>
>>I was saying for OKP to say 'terrorist muslims aren't
>>significant in islam', why can't I say 'hypocritcal
>christians
>>are not significant in christianity'?
>
>You can say that all you like, but it doesn't have any bearing
>on what I said or your response that I was apparently a
>Christian once and have changed so much.


"There are plenty of christians like that" Is what you recently replied with.


so...what does the amount of muslims who do terrorist acts signify?




>>
>>You are calling different states of existence a grade.
>You've
>>already said there are christian who are hypocritcal (and
>>since you have recently state that isn't totally what all
>>christian are) then there are, in your estimation, some
>>christian WHO ARE NOT HYPOCRITICAL.
>>
>>IS THAT GRADING TOO? SOME HYPOCRITICAL AND SOME NOT?
>
>The way you put it yes. You're the one who brought up
>"extremely flawed".

divorcing porn lovin' hypocritcal christians brought up by who???????


If that's not a grading up from flawed I
>don't know what is. A sinner is a sinner,


A christian is a christian.


>
>>>
>>
>>This is a group of flawed christians. I already admitted
>there
>>are flawed christians. Just like many on OKP say there are
>>some non-terrorist muslims.
>>
>>Are you going to emphasized flawed christians? Is it wrong
>to
>>emphasize terrorist muslims?
>>
>
>Wow. "Many on OKP say there are some non-terrorist muslims".
>You can't come to that conclusion yourself? People say it but,
>what, you don't believe it so you'll only vouch for the fact
>that other people say it? That's very prejudicial.
>
>There's nothing wrong with talking about terrorists when it's
>appropriate. Bringing it up here in this fashion is weird and
>looks prejudicial.


You talk about divorcing porn lovin' christians when you feel it is appropriate, I speak on other groups when I deem appropriate.


>
>>
>>I was just struck by a message from someone who I had
>thought
>>to be a christian that was looking for negativity about
>>christians.
>
>Because I should only be looking for negativity about
>non-Christians? And that makes me not a Christian? What's so
>bad about calling out hypocrisy in Christians?
>


Whatever you do is whatever you do. It identifies who you are.