>
>>All Christians have flaws, "blatant" or otherwise. If you're
>>going to come hard against Bruce Jenner in this post, or me
>>for that matter, without going hard against yourself, I'm
>>calling hypocrisy, especially if you're on that
>divorce/child
>>out of wedlock/porn tip which gets right into the so called
>>family values portion of the Christian conservative bloc
>that
>>rails against the likes of Bruce Jenner.
>>
>
>
>Some christians will talk about sin. Some will have their
>lives in right order with the Heavenly Father and Jesus.
>
>Some christians will talk about sin and not have their lives
>in right order with the Heavenly Father and Jesus.
>
>
>Certain types like to focus on the hypocritical christians,
>but that is unwise because there are christians who are in
>order with their lives.

So we should only focus on the good Christians, but Christians can just feel free to take pot shots at whoever else as they see fit. That's a real white privilege way to approach spirituality.

>
>
>But it makes certain folks more secure to think all christians
>are extremely flawed.
>
>That's unwise.

It does make some people feel more secure to think that we're all equal in sin, and therefore all equal in Jesus' eyes in our deserving of forgiveness. I'm all for anything that makes people feel more secure about Jesus' sacrifice and their worthiness to receive it. If you think that's unwise, more power to you, but I'm not one of those Christians who grades some Christians as higher than others in Jesus' eyes. I've not changed in that regard, you just weren't paying attention, or were reading what I said and making it into something different.

But, you know, any time you want to stop running away from what was actually being said and address it, feel free.