>admitting that the magazine was wrong to publish the cartoons
>doesn't mean we think the magazine staff deserved to be
>killed. saying we understand the root of the violence doesn't
>mean we excuse it. it just means we can place it in context.
>we see the bigger picture. we're not left just wringing our
>hands and wondering WHY this happened. we have some idea why
>it happened. and it shouldn't have happened.
>
>those terrorists should've found another way to express their
>anger at the cartoons. shooting up the joint was not the way.
>
>
>and damn...it's so white of the 'Je Suis Charlie' crowd to get
>on that freedom of expression bullshit and to agree w/Charlie
>that they shouldn't ever censor themselves b/c fuck the
>feelings and experiences of oppressed ppl. like, wow.
>
>thankfully whitey is more in check here in the USA.
>
>like, whitey could be on TV right now in blackface. all over
>the dial in that shit. whitey has the RIGHT to do that. why
>doesn't whitey do that here? b/c whitey gets that it's not
>RIGHT to go there.
>
>that's what Charlie and the rest of those who support the mag
>need to understand. just b/c the mag has the right to be
>awful doesn't mean it's right to be awful. in fact, i think
>it makes them better ppl and they get to be even more suprema
>.. i mean, superior if they do censor themselves in
>consideration of others. especially in consideration of the
>downtrodden. but they don't b/c...hate. and it's naked and
>sickening.
>

If people can't understand this, they never will.