>interesting to compare these 2 groups. I'm seeing some folks
>who kind of switched sides in this...like they were
>anti-R.Kelly..but now they making excuses for Bill Cosby.
>
>I mean there isn't tape of Bill Cosby doing anything
>illegal...so they are different situations....
>
>but it's interesting to compare these 2 group of
>apologists.... different demographics..but not in all
>cases...
>
>

There is no tape, no evidence and he hasn't been charged with a crime there is a huge difference

I'm not saying he did or didn't do it and everybody has a right to come to their own conclusion but knowing the history of black men being charged with rape in this country, I'm finding it hard to believe white women in the 60s would be afraid to charge a black man with rape and all of these women wanted something from Cos. I'm not going to just quickly assume he's guilty.