>I don't want to harp on the 'ITS DIFFERENT ON THE BOOK'. But
>it IS different from the book, lol.
>
>But im kinda surprised you guys are giving the zombies/mutants
>this much credit even the screenwriter. He purposely took out
>the smart vampire/Will Smith is the badguy angle, its not
>surprising Will Smith confirmed it in the commentary with the
>'they are dumb' comment
>>>>

I didn't read the book until after I saw the movie and I still picked up on everything I wrote.

>Yeah, he cared about the female, but your going to see
>examples of that all over the animal kingdom of animals
>protecting their own.
>

Yes, and given his relationship with his dog we can infer that maybe there's not as much difference between humans and other animals as we would like to believe.

Which reminds me that even the vampires in the film kept their dogs on leashes.


>He was a complete and total pussy>>>>

Not wanting to fight one million vampires makes him a pussy?

and avoided confrontation at
>all cost except when he tried to capture a few to'cure' them
>(which the character in the book was doing in addition to his
>hunting quests).
>>>>

A few of them? There were dozens of pictures of them on his wall.


>
>Two totally different stories.

I don't think anyone is arguing otherwise.