>i can't think of a bigger waste of time than debating with oe
>about pulp fiction. he's like some kind of logic-repelling
>force field.

Name one wholly illogical point that I've made,
and tell me why its *more* illogical than
someone arguing that the use of drugs in
'Pulp Fiction' was a metaphor for the scales
of justice in society.


No one called out the person who made that
retarded connection when it was made
on here before(that comment went completely
unscathed, even among the people who
said that they like PF and said that anyone who
saw it as anything more than a cool fun
popcorn flick was an "idiot").

Even better, some Einstein said 'Pulp Fiction'
was a "Zeitgeist" film in this very discussion.

Its hard for me to see how my arguments are
any more illogical than any of the above.

And that being the case, I'm not sure why
I deserve the 'illogical' label more than
anyone else.


Unless, of course, I'm debating a cultural
conglomerate who doesn't think for themselves
and reflexively writes off contrary viewpoints..
....but that can't be the case...



....can it?



No.


That would be illogical.


Lol.



----------------------------


O_E: Your Super-Ego's Favorite Poster.



"I ORBITs the solar system, listenin..."

(C)Keith Murray, "Cosmic Slop"