Listening to you guys try to convince yourself that I'm
just delusional and have no substantive points.

Every single one of you just writes:

"Oh, he's just nuts. Why should I bother."

If you write it enough times, than you don't have
to bother addressing the validity of my statements,
and as Frank Longo(who disagrees with me) said, I have
several points which are valid.

And you all know that.

Instead, you all do the following:

1)Try to find something insignificant to nitpick,
like the guy above trying to debate me on the
importance of the soundtrack(not only is he wrong,
that isn't, at all, relevant to the greater discussion)

2)Try to simply say: "You're delusional...you're a tool"

Its a compliment.

Because no one here has countered any of my fundamental
points:

a)You guys say: "I saw it when it first came out"

I say: "Well, the hype had actually begun before it
came out, and I remember it clearly. Also, if you saw it
when it came out, then you're actually worse than everyone
else, because you BUILT the pretentious bandwagon"

b)You guys say: "It wasn't that deep. I liked it because
it was simple and fun."

I say: "If that is your opinion, than you disagree
with many other opinions in this very post(that I
point out). Also, if that is your opinion, than
why is this film revered so much relative to other
simple B movies?"


c)You guys say: "It was profound and earth shattering."

I say: "BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....how? And on what basis
do you conclude the random ass things that you conclude?"


I mean, I really, really, really, want to be convinced and
have an intelligent conversation on the topic.

I just clown y'all and act like an asshole because its...
...well....fun.

Sorta like 'Pulp Fiction' is supposed to be.